On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, December 05, 2013 09:03:02 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> We've had a report [1] of the backtrace below on the latest rawhide
>>> kernel, which is essentially Linu
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>
> On Thursday, December 05, 2013 09:03:02 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We've had a report [1] of the backtrace below on the latest rawhide
>> kernel, which is essentially Linus' tree as of yesterday. We aren't
>> carrying any patches
On Thursday, December 05, 2013 09:03:02 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We've had a report [1] of the backtrace below on the latest rawhide
> kernel, which is essentially Linus' tree as of yesterday. We aren't
> carrying any patches to crypto at the moment. It's basically hitting
> the secon
Hi All,
We've had a report [1] of the backtrace below on the latest rawhide
kernel, which is essentially Linus' tree as of yesterday. We aren't
carrying any patches to crypto at the moment. It's basically hitting
the second BUG_ON in the sg_page function:
static inline struct page *sg_page(stru