Hi all,
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:28:45 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/inst.h
>
> between commit:
>
> d7866e503bdc ("crypto: x86 - Remove include/asm/inst.h")
> (also "crypto: x86 - Put back integer parts
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
arch/x86/include/asm/inst.h
between commit:
d7866e503bdc ("crypto: x86 - Remove include/asm/inst.h")
(also "crypto: x86 - Put back integer parts of include/asm/inst.h"
which I have added to the crypto tree merge today)
fro
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 09:31:18AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Please find attached the incremental patch that puts back integer
> parts of inst.h. This resolves the conflict with the tip tree.
Sorry but you can't send a patch without changing the Subject line
as otherwise patchwork will simply tr
Hi Uros,
On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:13:51 +0200 Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:03 AM Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>
> > > Please find attached the incremental patch that puts back integer
> > > parts of inst.h. This resolves the conflict with the tip tree.
> >
> > The tip tree cha
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:03 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Please find attached the incremental patch that puts back integer
> > parts of inst.h. This resolves the conflict with the tip tree.
>
> The tip tree change needs the XMM parts kept as well, sorry.
Strange, because I did test my patch w
Hi Uros,
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 09:31:18 +0200 Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> Please find attached the incremental patch that puts back integer
> parts of inst.h. This resolves the conflict with the tip tree.
The tip tree change needs the XMM parts kept as well, sorry.
So I ended up just removing the actu
Please find attached the incremental patch that puts back integer
parts of inst.h. This resolves the conflict with the tip tree.
Uros.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:45 AM Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 08:27:27AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >
> > I will prepare a v2 that leaves needed
Hi Herbert,
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 16:44:01 +1000 Herbert Xu
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 08:27:27AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >
> > I will prepare a v2 that leaves needed part of inst.h.
>
> Your patch has already been applied. So please make it an
> incremental patch.
Thank you both.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 08:27:27AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> I will prepare a v2 that leaves needed part of inst.h.
Your patch has already been applied. So please make it an
incremental patch.
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gond
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 6:47 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/inst.h
>
> between commit:
>
> d7866e503bdc ("crypto: x86 - Remove include/asm/inst.h")
>
> from the crypto tree and commit:
>
> eaad98
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
arch/x86/include/asm/inst.h
between commit:
d7866e503bdc ("crypto: x86 - Remove include/asm/inst.h")
from the crypto tree and commit:
eaad981291ee ("x86/entry/64: Introduce the FIND_PERCPU_BASE macro")
from the tip tre
11 matches
Mail list logo
