On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:24:27PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> No matter what you pick as your final solution, should I send a
> 's/module_init/subsys_initcall/' patch for cryptomgr & algapi?
cryptomgr already uses subsys_initcall and algapi doesn't need
it yet because it only reg
* Herbert Xu | 2008-12-24 15:48:51 [+1100]:
>On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 09:43:41AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
>>
>> I think that is not easy. Not all architecture follow the same directory
>> structure arch//crypto. And arch/x86/crypto is used by user mode
>> linux too.
>
>Right, relying on link order
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 09:43:41AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
>
> I think that is not easy. Not all architecture follow the same directory
> structure arch//crypto. And arch/x86/crypto is used by user mode
> linux too.
Right, relying on link order is hazardous.
However, since the table isn't that l
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 21:01 +0800, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Huang Ying | 2008-12-23 16:49:26 [+0800]:
>
> >If aes_x86_64 and aes_generic are compiled as builtin, the
> >initialization order is undetermined. That is, aes_x86_64 may be
> >initilized before aes_generic is initilized, but
* Huang Ying | 2008-12-23 16:49:26 [+0800]:
>If aes_x86_64 and aes_generic are compiled as builtin, the
>initialization order is undetermined. That is, aes_x86_64 may be
>initilized before aes_generic is initilized, but aes_x86_64 depends on
>tables generated in aes_generic initialization code. ae
aes_x86_64 depends on
tables generated in aes_generic initialization code. aes_x86_64 can
not work before aes_generic is initialized, so that cause register
time testing failed with following error message:
[0.657034] alg: cipher: Test 1 failed on encryption for aes-asm
[0.65711
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 08:26:03PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On my new thinkpad with a Intel Core2 Duo T9600 I reproducibly get
> this message during boot:
>
> [ 0.657034] alg: cipher: Test 1 failed on encryption for aes-asm
> [0.657111] : 00 01 02 03 04 05
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 07:55:10AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> You forgot to list the kernel version :)
2.6.28-rc9, aka Linus' git as of today.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at ht
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On my new thinkpad with a Intel Core2 Duo T9600 I reproducibly get
> this message during boot:
>
> [ 0.657034] alg: cipher: Test 1 failed on encryption for aes-asm
> [0.657111] : 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08
>
>
On my new thinkpad with a Intel Core2 Duo T9600 I reproducibly get
this message during boot:
[0.657034] alg: cipher: Test 1 failed on encryption for aes-asm
[0.657111] : 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08
I'd assume it's not a hardware but, so my the ass
10 matches
Mail list logo
