Le 02/12/2020 à 14:18, Steffen Klassert a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 03:10:48PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
[snip]
>> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c
>> index aa4cdcf69d471..24af61c95b4d4 100644
>> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c
>> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_interf
Hi Steffen,
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 02:18:47PM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 03:10:48PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
[...]
> > diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c
> > index aa4cdcf69d471..24af61c95b4d4 100644
> > --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 03:10:48PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:55:11AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 02:12:00PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Is this a bug or an expected quirk when using XFRM interface?
> > > >
> > > > This
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:55:11AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 02:12:00PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Is this a bug or an expected quirk when using XFRM interface?
> > >
> > > This is expected behaviour. The xfrm interfaces are plaintext devices,
> > > t
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 02:12:00PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > >
> > > Is this a bug or an expected quirk when using XFRM interface?
> >
> > This is expected behaviour. The xfrm interfaces are plaintext devices,
> > the plaintext packets are routed to the xfrm interface which guarantees
> > tra
Hi Steffen,
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:40:21AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 12:23:42PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > I am working on a ticket complaining about netfilter policy match
> > missing packets in OUTPUT chain if XFRM interface is being used.
> >
> > I don't f
Hi Phil,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 12:23:42PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
>
> I am working on a ticket complaining about netfilter policy match
> missing packets in OUTPUT chain if XFRM interface is being used.
>
> I don't fully overlook the relevant code path, but it seems like
> skb_
Hi Steffen,
I am working on a ticket complaining about netfilter policy match
missing packets in OUTPUT chain if XFRM interface is being used.
I don't fully overlook the relevant code path, but it seems like
skb_dest(skb)->xfrm is not yet assigned when the skb is routed towards
XFRM interface and