> -Original Message
> From: Eric Biggers
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 1:07 AM
> To: Pascal Van Leeuwen
> Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org; Herbert Xu ;
> da...@davemloft.net
> Subject: Re: Testmgr fuzz testing
>
> > >
> > > Sure, it's
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:09:03PM +, Pascal Van Leeuwen wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Eric Biggers
> > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 6:06 PM
> > To: Pascal Van Leeuwen
> > Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org; Herbert Xu ;
> > da...@davemlo
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Biggers
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 6:06 PM
> To: Pascal Van Leeuwen
> Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org; Herbert Xu ;
> da...@davemloft.net
> Subject: Re: Testmgr fuzz testing
>
> Hi Pascal,
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 201
Hi Pascal,
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:27:22AM +, Pascal Van Leeuwen wrote:
> Eric,
>
> While fixing some issues in the inside-secure driver reported by the fuzz, I
> noticed that the
> results are actually not repeatable: odds are high that on the next run, the
> error case is
> actually
Eric,
While fixing some issues in the inside-secure driver reported by the fuzz, I
noticed that the
results are actually not repeatable: odds are high that on the next run, the
error case is
actually not hit anymore since they're typically very specific corner cases.
There's 2 problems with
