Vitaly Chikunov wrote:
> This will be hard to do since there is at least tree device that use
> this interface (and who know how much out of tree):
>
> drivers$ git grep cra_name.*rsa
> crypto/caam/caampkc.c: .cra_name = "rsa",
> crypto/ccp/ccp-crypto-rsa.c:.cra_name =
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 06:12:33PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Vitaly Chikunov wrote:
> > Current akcipher .verify() just decrypts signature to uncover message
> > hash, which is then verified in upper level public_key_verify_signature
> > by memcmp with the expected signature value, which is never
Tudor,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:26:53AM +, tudor.amba...@microchip.com wrote:
>
> On 12/11/2018 06:59 PM, Vitaly Chikunov wrote:
> > Current akcipher .verify() just decrypts signature to uncover message
> > hash, which is then verified in upper level public_key_verify_signature
> > by memcm
Hi,
On 12/11/2018 06:59 PM, Vitaly Chikunov wrote:
> Current akcipher .verify() just decrypts signature to uncover message
> hash, which is then verified in upper level public_key_verify_signature
> by memcmp with the expected signature value, which is never passed into
> verify().
>
> This appro
Vitaly Chikunov wrote:
> Current akcipher .verify() just decrypts signature to uncover message
> hash, which is then verified in upper level public_key_verify_signature
> by memcmp with the expected signature value, which is never passed into
> verify().
>
> This approach is incompatible with ECD
