Am Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2020, 04:07:30 CET schrieb yumeng:
Hi yumeng,
>
> I see in "SEC 2: Recommended Elliptic Curve Domain ParametersVersion2.0"
> that 'Recommend Elliptic Curve Domain Parameters over Fp' are secp192,
> secp224, secp256, secp384, and secp521, secp128 and secp320 are not
>
在 2020/12/17 4:10, Stephan Mueller 写道:
Am Mittwoch, dem 16.12.2020 um 10:39 +0800 schrieb yumeng:
Am Freitag, den 11.12.2020, 14:30 +0800 schrieb Meng Yu:
+/* size in bytes of the n prime */
+#define HPRE_ECC_NIST_P128_N_SIZE 16
Do we truly need P-128? Besides, I do not see that
Am Mittwoch, dem 16.12.2020 um 10:39 +0800 schrieb yumeng:
>
>
>
> > Am Freitag, den 11.12.2020, 14:30 +0800 schrieb Meng Yu:
> > >
> > > +/* size in bytes of the n prime */
> > > +#define HPRE_ECC_NIST_P128_N_SIZE 16
> >
> > Do we truly need P-128? Besides, I do not see that curve being
Am Freitag, den 11.12.2020, 14:30 +0800 schrieb Meng Yu:
+/* size in bytes of the n prime */
+#define HPRE_ECC_NIST_P128_N_SIZE 16
Do we truly need P-128? Besides, I do not see that curve being defined in
contemporary cipher specs.
+#define HPRE_ECC_NIST_P192_N_SIZE 24
+#defin
Am Freitag, den 11.12.2020, 14:30 +0800 schrieb Meng Yu:
>
> +/* size in bytes of the n prime */
> +#define HPRE_ECC_NIST_P128_N_SIZE 16
Do we truly need P-128? Besides, I do not see that curve being defined in
contemporary cipher specs.
> +#define HPRE_ECC_NIST_P192_N_SIZE 24
> +#defi
