On Thursday, July 10, 2014 at 01:18:41 PM, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
[...]
> > All right, that was my understanding of the entire discussion -- an
> > accelerator dying mid-way and what will IMA do about that.
> >
> >> But as we fallback to early allocated shash, which is not USB yet,
> >> then there
On 10/07/14 11:02, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Thursday, July 10, 2014 at 01:05:39 AM, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
>> On 10 July 2014 00:00, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, July 08, 2014 at 10:07:16 AM, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
> Right, but my concern is not about unloading the kernel mo
On Thursday, July 10, 2014 at 01:05:39 AM, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> On 10 July 2014 00:00, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 08, 2014 at 10:07:16 AM, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >> > Right, but my concern is not about unloading the kernel module, but
> >> > about the IMA module p
On 10 July 2014 00:00, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 08, 2014 at 10:07:16 AM, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> [...]
>> > Right, but my concern is not about unloading the kernel module, but
>> > about the IMA module parameters left initialized. The existing code
>> > will continue using ahash (so
On Tuesday, July 08, 2014 at 10:07:16 AM, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
[...]
> > Right, but my concern is not about unloading the kernel module, but
> > about the IMA module parameters left initialized. The existing code
> > will continue using ahash (software version), even though the kernel
> > module
On 07/07/14 19:34, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 19:11 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
>> On 07/07/14 18:44, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:37 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
On 07/07/14 14:56, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 15:05 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 19:11 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> On 07/07/14 18:44, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:37 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> >> On 07/07/14 14:56, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 15:05 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> +/**
> >>> This is the k
On 07/07/14 18:44, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:37 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
>> On 07/07/14 14:56, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 15:05 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
+/**
>>> This is the kernel-doc delimiter.
>>>
+ * ima_calc_file_hash - calculae file ha
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:37 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> On 07/07/14 14:56, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 15:05 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> >>
> >> +/**
> > This is the kernel-doc delimiter.
> >
> >> + * ima_calc_file_hash - calculae file hash
> >> + *
> > Missing kernel-doc
On 07/07/14 14:56, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 15:05 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
>> Async hash API allows to use HW acceleration for hash calculation.
>> It may give significant performance gain or/and reduce power consumption,
>> which might be very beneficial for battery powered
On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 15:05 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> Async hash API allows to use HW acceleration for hash calculation.
> It may give significant performance gain or/and reduce power consumption,
> which might be very beneficial for battery powered devices.
>
> This patch introduces hash c
11 matches
Mail list logo
