> "Sagi" == Sagi Grimberg writes:
Sagi,
Sagi> I thought that WRITE_SAME with DIX would include PI for the block
Sagi> that is being sent over the wire, the initiator and target HBAs
Sagi> will verify the single block integrity and the target backend will
Sagi> expand the PI for the number of
On 4/28/2015 2:50 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
"Sagi" == Sagi Grimberg writes:
Sagi> The problem is that the HBA does not have the write_same
Sagi> functionality you introduce here, i.e. generate multiple same
Sagi> protection fields for a single data block.
Adding support to DIX would be pr
> "Sagi" == Sagi Grimberg writes:
Sagi> The problem is that the HBA does not have the write_same
Sagi> functionality you introduce here, i.e. generate multiple same
Sagi> protection fields for a single data block.
Adding support to DIX would be problematic since it would essentially
turn a W
On 4/25/2015 5:33 PM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
This patchset aims to fix several problems related to T10-PI support.
These patches can be applied on top of Sagi's "[v1] Simlify dif_verify
routines and fixup fileio protection information code" patchset.
Hi Akinobu,
I have given this some more thou
