Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] s390/crypto: Use -ENODEV instead of -EOPNOTSUPP

2019-06-13 Thread Herbert Xu
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 05:08:50PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 03:33:02PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > s390x crypto is one of the rare modules that returns -EOPNOTSUPP instead of > > -ENODEV in case HW support is not available. > > > > Convert to -ENODEV, so e.g.,

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] s390/crypto: Use -ENODEV instead of -EOPNOTSUPP

2019-06-13 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:13:55AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 05:08:50PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 03:33:02PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > s390x crypto is one of the rare modules that returns -EOPNOTSUPP instead > > > of > > > -ENODEV

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] s390/crypto: Use -ENODEV instead of -EOPNOTSUPP

2019-06-12 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 03:33:02PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > s390x crypto is one of the rare modules that returns -EOPNOTSUPP instead of > -ENODEV in case HW support is not available. > > Convert to -ENODEV, so e.g., systemd's systemd-modules-load.service > ignores this error properly. >

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] s390/crypto: Use -ENODEV instead of -EOPNOTSUPP

2019-06-12 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:33:02 +0200 David Hildenbrand wrote: > s390x crypto is one of the rare modules that returns -EOPNOTSUPP instead of > -ENODEV in case HW support is not available. > > Convert to -ENODEV, so e.g., systemd's systemd-modules-load.service > ignores this error properly. > > v2