Am Donnerstag, 23. April 2015, 16:18:31 schrieb Paul Bolle:
Hi Paul,
> On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 16:08 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > Other patches that are in the kernel that I wrote (e.g.
> > the crypto/drbg.c) have the same license as above, but use
> > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL") -- Thus I would thi
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 16:08 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Other patches that are in the kernel that I wrote (e.g.
> the crypto/drbg.c) have the same license as above, but use
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL") -- Thus I would think that leaving it as is should be
> ok.
Why not submit the trivial patches
Am Donnerstag, 23. April 2015, 16:05:08 schrieb Paul Bolle:
Hi Paul,
> A nit only, I'm afraid: this patch adds a license mismatch.
>
> On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 21:25 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/crypto/jitterentropy.c
> >
> > + * License
> > + * ===
> > + *
> > + *
A nit only, I'm afraid: this patch adds a license mismatch.
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 21:25 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/crypto/jitterentropy.c
> + * License
> + * ===
> + *
> + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> + * modification, are p
