Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_32 policies

2020-05-25 Thread Eric Biggers
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:41:41PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > From: Eric Biggers > > The eMMC inline crypto standard will only specify 32 DUN bits (a.k.a. IV > bits), unlike UFS's 64. IV_INO_LBLK_64 is therefore not applicable, but > an encryption format which uses one key per policy and permi

Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_32 policies

2020-05-19 Thread Eric Biggers
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 07:13:21AM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:41:41PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > From: Eric Biggers > > > > The eMMC inline crypto standard will only specify 32 DUN bits (a.k.a. IV > > bits), unlike UFS's 64. IV_INO_LBLK_64 is therefore not ap

Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_32 policies

2020-05-19 Thread Theodore Y. Ts'o
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:41:41PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > From: Eric Biggers > > The eMMC inline crypto standard will only specify 32 DUN bits (a.k.a. IV > bits), unlike UFS's 64. IV_INO_LBLK_64 is therefore not applicable, but > an encryption format which uses one key per policy and permi