On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 08:51 +0100, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 09:04:58AM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 21:15 +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> > > The sha x86 crypto code use two define for the same thing:
> > > NUM_SHA1_DIGEST_WORDS and SHA1_DIGEST_LENGTH
> > >
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 09:04:58AM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 21:15 +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> > The sha x86 crypto code use two define for the same thing:
> > NUM_SHA1_DIGEST_WORDS and SHA1_DIGEST_LENGTH
> > Replace them by SHA1_DIGEST_SIZE/4
>
> Thanks. Acked-by: Tim Che
On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 21:15 +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> The sha x86 crypto code use two define for the same thing:
> NUM_SHA1_DIGEST_WORDS and SHA1_DIGEST_LENGTH
> Replace them by SHA1_DIGEST_SIZE/4
Thanks. Acked-by: Tim Chen
>
> Signed-off-by: LABBE Corentin
--
To unsubscribe from this l
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> The sha x86 crypto code use two define for the same thing:
> NUM_SHA1_DIGEST_WORDS and SHA1_DIGEST_LENGTH
> Replace them by SHA1_DIGEST_SIZE/4
That's wrong. Use only one for the number of words and make the define
so it's derived from the LENGTH.
Than