Hi Kim,
On 11/04/2014 06:57 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:57:57 +0200
> Cristian Stoica wrote:
>> Do you want me to drop the patch and pretend there is nothing to see?
>
> no, fixing potential bugs preemptively is fine; I'd just like to
> know that's the case: it wasn't clear
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:57:57 +0200
Cristian Stoica wrote:
> Hi Kim,
>
> >> Actually, our static code analyzer did not see this one.
> >
> > ok, so the patch technically isn't fixing anything broken, then.
>
> Are you saying the code isn't broken _because_ a static tool analyser
> did not see an
Hi Kim,
>> Actually, our static code analyzer did not see this one.
>
> ok, so the patch technically isn't fixing anything broken, then.
Are you saying the code isn't broken _because_ a static tool analyser
did not see anything wrong here?
> the new code just added a new condition, which doesn
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 11:18:36 +0200
Cristian Stoica wrote:
> On 10/31/2014 08:22 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 18:57:33 +0200
> > Cristian Stoica wrote:
> >
> > If this issue was brought up by h/w, the appropriate new error codes
> > should be being introduced.
>
> If you have
Hi Kim,
On 10/31/2014 08:22 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 18:57:33 +0200
> Cristian Stoica wrote:
>
> If this issue was brought up by h/w, the appropriate new error codes
> should be being introduced.
If you have the new error codes please send them to me and I'll make an
update
On Friday, October 31, 2014 at 07:22:09 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 18:57:33 +0200
>
> Cristian Stoica wrote:
> > The error code returned by hardware is four bits wide with an expected
> > zero MSB. A hardware error condition where the error code can get between
> > 0x8 and 0xf
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 18:57:33 +0200
Cristian Stoica wrote:
> The error code returned by hardware is four bits wide with an expected
> zero MSB. A hardware error condition where the error code can get between
> 0x8 and 0xf will trigger an out of bound array access on the error
> message table.
If