On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:25 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
>
> On 21/08/18 18:00, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On 21 August 2018 at 18:50, Nick Desaulniers
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 5:23 AM Ard Biesheuvel
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Nick,
> >>>
> >>> On 21 August 2018 at 00:40, Nick Desauln
On 21/08/18 18:00, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 21 August 2018 at 18:50, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 5:23 AM Ard Biesheuvel
wrote:
Hi Nick,
On 21 August 2018 at 00:40, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
It seems that:
ldr q8, =0x300020001
is a GNU as convience notation for:
On 21 August 2018 at 18:50, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 5:23 AM Ard Biesheuvel
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> On 21 August 2018 at 00:40, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>> > It seems that:
>> > ldr q8, =0x300020001
>> >
>> > is a GNU as convience notation for:
>> > ldr q8,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 5:23 AM Ard Biesheuvel
wrote:
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> On 21 August 2018 at 00:40, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > It seems that:
> > ldr q8, =0x300020001
> >
> > is a GNU as convience notation for:
> > ldr q8, .Lconstant
> > .Lconstant
> > .word 0x0001
> > .word 0x000
Hi Nick,
On 21 August 2018 at 00:40, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> It seems that:
> ldr q8, =0x300020001
>
> is a GNU as convience notation for:
> ldr q8, .Lconstant
> .Lconstant
> .word 0x0001
> .word 0x0002
> .word 0x0003
> .word 0x
>
> based on this comment in binutils'
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 03:40:32PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> It seems that:
> ldr q8, =0x300020001
>
> is a GNU as convience notation for:
> ldr q8, .Lconstant
> .Lconstant
> .word 0x0001
> .word 0x0002
> .word 0x0003
> .word 0x
Does still this work correctly fo
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 3:41 PM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
>
> It seems that:
> ldr q8, =0x300020001
>
> is a GNU as convience notation for:
> ldr q8, .Lconstant
> .Lconstant
> .word 0x0001
> .word 0x0002
> .word 0x0003
> .word 0x
>
> based on this comment in binutils' sou