Hi.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:53:41AM -0700, Loc Ho ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >You do not need to pass multiple pointers, but instead a multiple data.
> >You can do that via single area provided to the kernel and multiple size
> >fields, where each
> > one corresponds to the size of the cont
Hi,
>
>You do not need to pass multiple pointers, but instead a multiple data.
>You can do that via single area provided to the kernel and multiple size
>fields, where each
> one corresponds to the size of the contiguous sectors in the provided data.
[Loc Ho]
It sounds like the solution is to f
Hi.
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 03:24:20PM -0700, Loc Ho ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This sound like the only solution to passing more than one pointers from user
> space is via custom system call - such as (new) crypto_op(...). Am I correct?
No, it is not a right solution. Linux has so ugly compat
08, 2008 2:10 PM
To: Shasi Pulijala
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org; Loc Ho
Subject: Re: OpenSSL patch to support Linux CryptoAPI.
Hi.
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 11:31:58AM -0700, Shasi Pulijala ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> struct crypt_op {
> - u_int32_t ses;
> - u_int16_t
Hi.
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 11:31:58AM -0700, Shasi Pulijala ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> struct crypt_op {
> - u_int32_t ses;
> - u_int16_t op; /* i.e. COP_ENCRYPT */
> #define COP_NONE 0
> #define COP_ENCRYPT 1
> #define COP_DECRYPT 2
> - u_int16_t
