On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:25:11AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> You should continue to do your own chaining if it's a requirement for
> the driver/layer to function, until we get rid of ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN.
> That'll happen when all archs are converted.
Thanks for the confirmation. I'll back out m
On Tue, Dec 04 2007, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 02:31:40PM +0100, Jan Glauber wrote:
> > Hi Herbert,
> >
> > commit 788fefa33b0b50581585925c53c230a36af35d0e in cryptodev breaks hmac
> > on s390 du to the usage of sg_chain():
> >
> > static inline void sg_chain(struct scatterlist
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 02:31:40PM +0100, Jan Glauber wrote:
> Hi Herbert,
>
> commit 788fefa33b0b50581585925c53c230a36af35d0e in cryptodev breaks hmac
> on s390 du to the usage of sg_chain():
>
> static inline void sg_chain(struct scatterlist *prv, unsigned int prv_nents,
>
Hi Herbert,
commit 788fefa33b0b50581585925c53c230a36af35d0e in cryptodev breaks hmac
on s390 du to the usage of sg_chain():
static inline void sg_chain(struct scatterlist *prv, unsigned int prv_nents,
struct scatterlist *sgl)
{
#ifndef ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN
BUG();