On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 05:24:41PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 3:19 PM Herbert Xu
> wrote:
> > Yes. In fact it's used for FIPS certification testing.
> > Sure, nobody sane should be doing it. But when it comes to
> > government certification... :)
>
> The kernel
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 05:18:24PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> N'ack. As I mentioned in the last email, this really isn't okay, and
> mostly defeats the purpose of Zinc in the first place, adding
> complexity in a discombobulated half-baked way. Your proposal seems to
> be the worst of all
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 05:24:41PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 3:19 PM Herbert Xu
> wrote:
> > Yes. In fact it's used for FIPS certification testing.
> > Sure, nobody sane should be doing it. But when it comes to
> > government certification... :)
>
> The kernel
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 3:19 PM Herbert Xu wrote:
> Yes. In fact it's used for FIPS certification testing.
> Sure, nobody sane should be doing it. But when it comes to
> government certification... :)
The kernel does not aim toward any FIPS certification, and we're not
going to start bloating o
Hi Herbert,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 7:02 AM Herbert Xu wrote:
> Here is an updated version demonstrating how we could access the
> accelerated versions of chacha20. It also includes a final patch
> to deposit the new zinc version of x86-64 chacha20 into
> arch/x86/crypto where it can be used by
Hi Ard:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:32:05AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> > 1. The crypto API algorithms remain individually accessible, this
> > is crucial as these algorithm names are exported to user-space so
> > changing the names to foo-zinc is not going to work.
>
> Are you saying user sp
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 07:02, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 01:24:51PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > In response to Martin's patch-set which I merged last week, I think
> > here is quick way out for the zinc interface.
> >
> > Going through the past zinc discussions it would app
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 01:24:51PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> In response to Martin's patch-set which I merged last week, I think
> here is quick way out for the zinc interface.
>
> Going through the past zinc discussions it would appear that
> everybody is quite happy with the zinc interface pe
