On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:48:31AM +0800, Shane Wang wrote:
>
> +/* x86_64 or amd64 */
> +#if (__GNUC__ && (__x86_64__ || __amd64__))
> +
> +#define ADD128(rh, rl, ih, il)
> \
> + asm ("addq %3, %1 \n\t" \
>
Hi Herbert,
I have updated it. How does this patch look? Please comment. Thanks a lot.
Shane
Signed-off-by: Shane Wang
Signed-off-by: Joseph Cihula
diff -r 7ccb4aa6908f crypto/Kconfig
--- a/crypto/KconfigWed Aug 05 15:43:38 2009 -0700
+++ b/crypto/KconfigFri Aug 14 03:54:21 2009 -07
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 01:05:57AM +0800, Shane Wang wrote:
>>
>> For the comment
>>> This is unnecessary. Please use the standard kernel helpers
>>> from asm/byteorder.h (which you get by including linux/kernel.h).
>> The current code distinguishes some macro implementations
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 01:05:57AM +0800, Shane Wang wrote:
>
> For the comment
> > This is unnecessary. Please use the standard kernel helpers
> > from asm/byteorder.h (which you get by including linux/kernel.h).
> The current code distinguishes some macro implementations according to
> differen
Hi community,
I have updated the patch.
For the comment
> This is unnecessary. Please use the standard kernel helpers
> from asm/byteorder.h (which you get by including linux/kernel.h).
The current code distinguishes some macro implementations according to different
platforms to improve the MA
