On 1/28/21 8:54 AM, David Howells wrote:
Stefan Berger wrote:
This (sub)set is intended to go through the keyrings tree or is it all going
through the crypto tree now?
Patch 1/3 should go through 'crypto', the other ones through 'keyrings'.
Do 2 & 3 depend on 1?
Functionality-wise, yes,
Stefan Berger wrote:
> > This (sub)set is intended to go through the keyrings tree or is it all going
> > through the crypto tree now?
>
>
> Patch 1/3 should go through 'crypto', the other ones through 'keyrings'.
Do 2 & 3 depend on 1?
David
On 1/28/21 4:19 AM, David Howells wrote:
This (sub)set is intended to go through the keyrings tree or is it all going
through the crypto tree now?
Patch 1/3 should go through 'crypto', the other ones through 'keyrings'.
Stefan
David
This (sub)set is intended to go through the keyrings tree or is it all going
through the crypto tree now?
David
From: Stefan Berger
This series of patches adds support for x509 certificates signed by a CA
that uses NIST p256 or p192 keys for signing. It also adds support for
certificates where the public key is a NIST p256 or p192 key. The math
for ECDSA signature verification is also added.
Since self-si
