Hi Uwe,
On 1/26/21 5:58 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> All amba drivers return 0 in their remove callback. Together with the
> driver core ignoring the return value anyhow, it doesn't make sense to
> return a value here.
>
> Change the remove prototype to return void, which makes it explicit that
Hi
On 1/26/21 4:58 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
All amba drivers return 0 in their remove callback. Together with the
driver core ignoring the return value anyhow, it doesn't make sense to
return a value here.
Change the remove prototype to return void, which makes it explicit that
returning an
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 06:56:52PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> I'm surprised to see that the remove callback introduced in 2952ecf5df33
> ("coresight: etm4x: Refactor probing routine") has an __exit annotation.
In general, remove callbacks should not have an __exit annotation.
__exit _can_ be
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 05:58:34PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> All amba drivers return 0 in their remove callback. Together with the
> driver core ignoring the return value anyhow, it doesn't make sense to
> return a value here.
>
> Change the remove prototype to return void, which makes it e
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 05:58:34PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> All amba drivers return 0 in their remove callback. Together with the
> driver core ignoring the return value anyhow, it doesn't make sense to
> return a value here.
>
> Change the remove prototype to return void, which makes it e
On 1/26/21 6:58 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
All amba drivers return 0 in their remove callback. Together with the
driver core ignoring the return value anyhow, it doesn't make sense to
return a value here.
Change the remove prototype to return void, which makes it explicit that
returning an erro
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:58:34 +0100,
Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
> All amba drivers return 0 in their remove callback. Together with the
> driver core ignoring the return value anyhow, it doesn't make sense to
> return a value here.
>
> Change the remove prototype to return void, which makes it expl
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 05:58:34PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> All amba drivers return 0 in their remove callback. Together with the
> driver core ignoring the return value anyhow, it doesn't make sense to
> return a value here.
>
> Change the remove prototype to return void, which makes it e
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 05:08:40PM +, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 1/26/21 4:58 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > All amba drivers return 0 in their remove callback. Together with the
> > driver core ignoring the return value anyhow, it doesn't make sense to
> > return a value here.
> >
All amba drivers return 0 in their remove callback. Together with the
driver core ignoring the return value anyhow, it doesn't make sense to
return a value here.
Change the remove prototype to return void, which makes it explicit that
returning an error value doesn't work as expected. This simplif
On 26-01-21, 17:58, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> All amba drivers return 0 in their remove callback. Together with the
> driver core ignoring the return value anyhow, it doesn't make sense to
> return a value here.
>
> Change the remove prototype to return void, which makes it explicit that
> returni
11 matches
Mail list logo
