On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 02:02:49PM +, Giovanni Cabiddu wrote:
>
> Are you suggesting to add to the struct acomp_req a pointer to a vmalloc
> area and remove the request context (which is contiguous to acomp_req and
> allocated in request_alloc)?
What I'm suggesting is simply to generalise the
Hi Herbert,
I would like to have some clarifications before submitting a v4.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 07:00:27PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:51:44PM +, Giovanni Cabiddu wrote:
> >
> > +#define CRYPTO_SCOMP_DECOMP_NOCTX CRYPTO_ALG_PRIVATE
>
> I don't think this should
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:51:44PM +, Giovanni Cabiddu wrote:
>
> +#define CRYPTO_SCOMP_DECOMP_NOCTX CRYPTO_ALG_PRIVATE
I don't think this should be an scomp-specific flag. The point of
noctx is that we don't need to do a request-specific vmalloc.
Chances are that with hardware offload that y
Add a synchronous back-end (scomp) to acomp. This allows to easily expose
the already present compression algorithms in LKCF via acomp.
Signed-off-by: Giovanni Cabiddu
---
crypto/Makefile |1 +
crypto/acompress.c | 75 ++-
crypto/scompress.c
