From: Eric Biggers
> Sent: 22 October 2020 05:35
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 04:39:57PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > Putting the round constants and the message schedule arrays together in
> > one structure saves one register, which can be a significant benefit on
> > register-constrained arc
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 04:39:57PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> Putting the round constants and the message schedule arrays together in
> one structure saves one register, which can be a significant benefit on
> register-constrained architectures. On x86-32 (tested on Broadwell
> Xeon), this gives
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 09:36:00PM +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Arvind Sankar
> > Sent: 20 October 2020 21:40
> >
> > Putting the round constants and the message schedule arrays together in
> > one structure saves one register, which can be a significant benefit on
> > register-constrained a
From: Arvind Sankar
> Sent: 20 October 2020 21:40
>
> Putting the round constants and the message schedule arrays together in
> one structure saves one register, which can be a significant benefit on
> register-constrained architectures. On x86-32 (tested on Broadwell
> Xeon), this gives a 10% per
Putting the round constants and the message schedule arrays together in
one structure saves one register, which can be a significant benefit on
register-constrained architectures. On x86-32 (tested on Broadwell
Xeon), this gives a 10% performance benefit.
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar
Suggested-by
