On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:29 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Dan Williams
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Dan Williams
wrote:
> On Tu
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:29 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Dan Williams
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Dan Williams
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Dan Williams
wrote:
> On Tue
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Dan Williams
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Dan Williams
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Anup Patel
wrote:
> The
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Dan Williams
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
The DMAENGINE framework assumes that if PQ offload is supported by a
>>
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 02:32:15PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Dan Williams
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Anup Patel
>> > wrote:
>> >> The DMAENGINE framework assumes that if PQ offload is su
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
>>> The DMAENGINE framework assumes that if PQ offload is supported by a
>>> DMA device then all 256 PQ coefficients are supported. This a
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 02:32:15PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
> >> The DMAENGINE framework assumes that if PQ offload is supported by a
> >> DMA device then all 256 PQ coefficients are suppo
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
>> The DMAENGINE framework assumes that if PQ offload is supported by a
>> DMA device then all 256 PQ coefficients are supported. This assumption
>> does not hold anymore because we now have B
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
> The DMAENGINE framework assumes that if PQ offload is supported by a
> DMA device then all 256 PQ coefficients are supported. This assumption
> does not hold anymore because we now have BCM-SBA-RAID offload engine
> which supports PQ offload wit
The DMAENGINE framework assumes that if PQ offload is supported by a
DMA device then all 256 PQ coefficients are supported. This assumption
does not hold anymore because we now have BCM-SBA-RAID offload engine
which supports PQ offload with limited number of PQ coefficients.
This patch extends asy
11 matches
Mail list logo