Hi Rob,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> Would it be OK to use: compatible = "fsl,imx51-sahara", "fsl,imx53-sahara"; ?
>
> Yes, but the order should be reversed as it should be most specific
> and newest first.
Thanks for the feedback. Just sent a dts patch as you suggest
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:27 PM Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 5:21 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> > Looks like imx51 should be a fallback and you can drop the driver
> > change.
>
> I thought about that too.
>
> If I do like this in imx51.dtsi:
>
> compatible = "fsl,imx
Hi Rob,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 5:21 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> Looks like imx51 should be a fallback and you can drop the driver
> change.
I thought about that too.
If I do like this in imx51.dtsi:
compatible = "fsl,imx51-sahara", "fsl,imx53-sahara";
Then the driver works just fine.
I was no
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 03:45:28PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam
>
> i.MX51 and i.MX53 share the same sahara IP block version, so add
> i.MX51 in the list of supported SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Fix typo in commit log "i.MX51 and i.M
From: Fabio Estevam
i.MX51 and i.MX53 share the same sahara IP block version, so add
i.MX51 in the list of supported SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
---
Changes since v1:
- Fix typo in commit log "i.MX51 and i.MX53"
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-sahara.txt | 5 +++--
1 f
