On Fri, 4 Oct 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 08:41:35PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On 4 October 2013 20:34, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2013, Will Deacon wrote:
> > [...]
> > >>
> > >> Why do you consider it unsuitable to ship the perl script wi
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 4 October 2013 20:34, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2013, Will Deacon wrote:
> [...]
> >>
> >> Why do you consider it unsuitable to ship the perl script with the kernel?
> >> Perl 5 is already documented as a build dependency in Documentatio
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 08:41:35PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 4 October 2013 20:34, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2013, Will Deacon wrote:
> [...]
> >>
> >> Why do you consider it unsuitable to ship the perl script with the kernel?
> >> Perl 5 is already documented as a build depen
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:34:01PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Do you have an example of something that does require perl to build the
> kernel on ARM? I was under the impression that people try to avoid it
> as much as possible in general.
>
> I'm personally sitting on the fence between effe
On 4 October 2013 20:34, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013, Will Deacon wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Why do you consider it unsuitable to ship the perl script with the kernel?
>> Perl 5 is already documented as a build dependency in Documentation/Changes
>
> Do you have an example of something that
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Also, remember that the GPL says:
>
> "The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for
> making modifications to it."
>
> So here's the question: is the assembly code the perferred form to make
> modifications? From what
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Ard,
>
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:59:23PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > Note to reviewers:
> > Reviewing the file aesbs-core.S may be a bit overwhelming, so if there are
> > any
> > questions or concerns, please refer the file bsaes-armv7.pl which
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 08:04:50PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> First of all, please note that the whole point of working so closely
> with the OpenSSL maintainer on this is that the version I am
> presenting here is the verbatim output of the Perl script that lives
> in the OpenSSL tree. So just
On 4 October 2013 19:48, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:59:23PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Note to reviewers:
>> Reviewing the file aesbs-core.S may be a bit overwhelming, so if there are
>> any
>> questions or concerns, please refer the file bsaes-armv7.pl which can be
>>
Hi Ard,
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:59:23PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Note to reviewers:
> Reviewing the file aesbs-core.S may be a bit overwhelming, so if there are any
> questions or concerns, please refer the file bsaes-armv7.pl which can be found
> at the link below. This is the original P
This is v2 of a series implementing a faster and more secure AES implementation
based on bit slicing using NEON instructions.
Changes since v1:
- implemented a suggestion by Jussi Kivilinna which substantially improves
decryption performance, decryption speedup is now 25% on Cortex-A15 (up from
11 matches
Mail list logo
