On 11 January 2017 at 12:28, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:14:24PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>
>> I think the old code was fine, actually:
>>
>> u32 *state, state_buf[16 + (CHACHA20_STATE_ALIGN / sizeof(u32)) - 1];
>>
>> ends up allocating 16 + 3 *words* == 64 + 12 bytes , whi
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:14:24PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> I think the old code was fine, actually:
>
> u32 *state, state_buf[16 + (CHACHA20_STATE_ALIGN / sizeof(u32)) - 1];
>
> ends up allocating 16 + 3 *words* == 64 + 12 bytes , which given the
> guaranteed 4 byte alignment is suffici
