On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 05:25:45PM -0500, Joy Latten wrote:
>
> Shouldn't p be incremented after this check? Otherwise, it will
> still be pointing to ')' after breaking from this for-loop and we will
> end up copying "hmac(sha1" instead of "hmac(sha1)", right?
> Also, I think we will prematurely
Sorry, I really messed up my Subject header.
This comment was for [PATCH 2/8] [CRYPTO] aead: Add support for
multiple template parameters in the patchset.
The second patch in patch set, not the eighth.
Joy
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 17:25 -0500, Joy Latten wrote:
> My apologies for such late notice,
My apologies for such late notice, but I observed this only recently
and wanted to point it out.
if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
goto err;
@@ -101,33 +106,73 @@ static int cryptomgr_schedule_probe(struct crypto_larval
*larval)
memcpy(param->template, name, le
