On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 12:12 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:59 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Dan Williams
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Anup Patel
>>> wrote:
>>> > The DMAENGINE framework assumes that if PQ offload is sup
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:59 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Dan Williams
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Anup Patel
>> wrote:
>> > The DMAENGINE framework assumes that if PQ offload is supported by a
>> > DMA device then all 256 PQ coefficients are sup
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Anup Patel wrote:
> > The DMAENGINE framework assumes that if PQ offload is supported by a
> > DMA device then all 256 PQ coefficients are supported. This assumption
> > does not hold anymore because we now h
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Anup Patel wrote:
> The DMAENGINE framework assumes that if PQ offload is supported by a
> DMA device then all 256 PQ coefficients are supported. This assumption
> does not hold anymore because we now have BCM-SBA-RAID offload engine
> which supports PQ offload with
The DMAENGINE framework assumes that if PQ offload is supported by a
DMA device then all 256 PQ coefficients are supported. This assumption
does not hold anymore because we now have BCM-SBA-RAID offload engine
which supports PQ offload with limited number of PQ coefficients.
This patch extends asy
