Every implementation of RSA that we have naturally generates
output with leading zeroes. The one and only user of RSA,
pkcs1pad wants to have those leading zeroes in place, in fact
because they are currently absent it has to write those zeroes
itself.
So we shouldn't be stripping leading zeroes i
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:23:06AM +, Benedetto, Salvatore wrote:
> Hi Herbert,
>
> >
> > This patch also changes DH to use the new interface.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu
> > ---
> >
> > crypto/rsa.c|8 +++
> > include/linux/mpi.h |2 -
> > lib/mpi/mpicoder.c |
Hi Herbert,
>
> This patch also changes DH to use the new interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu
> ---
>
> crypto/rsa.c|8 +++
> include/linux/mpi.h |2 -
> lib/mpi/mpicoder.c | 55 ---
> -
> 3 files changed, 31 insertio
Every implementation of RSA that we have naturally generates
output with leading zeroes. The one and only user of RSA,
pkcs1pad wants to have those leading zeroes in place, in fact
because they are currently absent it has to write those zeroes
itself.
So we shouldn't be stripping leading zeroes i
Every implementation of RSA that we have naturally generates
output with leading zeroes. The one and only user of RSA,
pkcs1pad wants to have those leading zeroes in place, in fact
because they are currently absent it has to write those zeroes
itself.
So we shouldn't be stripping leading zeroes i