On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 08:33:12AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Some investigation from FreeBSD shows that there is entropy available
> from measuring the device attach times:
>
> http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/cryptography/2013-October/005689.html
>
> This will hopefully help us more quic
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 06:51:18AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Is it an issue that dev->devt will almost always be 0,0 for this
> function call? Why not use the name instead here, that's more "unique"
> and every device has one, not just a tiny %.
Hmm, good point. Thanks for raising it. I'll make t
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 08:33:12AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Some investigation from FreeBSD shows that there is entropy available
> from measuring the device attach times:
>
> http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/cryptography/2013-October/005689.html
>
> This will hopefully help us more quic
Some investigation from FreeBSD shows that there is entropy available
from measuring the device attach times:
http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/cryptography/2013-October/005689.html
This will hopefully help us more quickly initialize the entropy pools
while the system is booting (which is one
