Re: [PATCH 1/1] CRYPTO: Fix checkpatch errors & warnings in cipher.c

2010-02-16 Thread Herbert Xu
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 01:06:27PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: > > One more question on workflow, though.. I have been checking > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/herbert/crypto-2.6.git;a=summary > for updates, but obviously, this was the wrong place. You should check the cryptodev-2.

Re: [PATCH 1/1] CRYPTO: Fix checkpatch errors & warnings in cipher.c

2010-02-16 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 13:00, Herbert Xu wrote: > For the crypto tree at least I've got all your patches so you > don't have to resend. OK, thank you very much. Expect more patches, in this case :) One more question on workflow, though.. I have been checking http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kern

Re: [PATCH 1/1] CRYPTO: Fix checkpatch errors & warnings in cipher.c

2010-02-16 Thread Herbert Xu
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:56:15PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: > > Thus, I wanted to check if I should wait some more or what the general > consensus of action in the crypto subtree is. > > And yes, I am aware that janitor work, and thus my patches, is very low > priority. For the crypto tree

Re: [PATCH 1/1] CRYPTO: Fix checkpatch errors & warnings in cipher.c

2010-02-16 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:46, Herbert Xu wrote: >> Should I re-send the patch or is it less noise & hassle if I just leave >> it this way? > > You don't have to resend it. GregKH said that I should just re-send all patches after a week. OTOH, I am not sure if this is not a little bit too agress

Re: [PATCH 1/1] CRYPTO: Fix checkpatch errors & warnings in cipher.c

2010-02-10 Thread Herbert Xu
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 03:21:26AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: > Obviously, this should have been named > > CRYPTO: Fix checkpatch errors & warnings in compress.c > > Should I re-send the patch or is it less noise & hassle if I just leave > it this way? You don't have to resend it. Thanks, -

Re: [PATCH 1/1] CRYPTO: Fix checkpatch errors & warnings in cipher.c

2010-02-09 Thread Richard Hartmann
Obviously, this should have been named CRYPTO: Fix checkpatch errors & warnings in compress.c Should I re-send the patch or is it less noise & hassle if I just leave it this way? Richard On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:30, Richard Hartmann wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Richard Hartmann > --- >  crypt

[PATCH 1/1] CRYPTO: Fix checkpatch errors & warnings in cipher.c

2010-02-09 Thread Richard Hartmann
Signed-off-by: Richard Hartmann --- crypto/cipher.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/crypto/cipher.c b/crypto/cipher.c index 9a1a731..39541e0 100644 --- a/crypto/cipher.c +++ b/crypto/cipher.c @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ * * This program is free software; you can

[PATCH 1/1] CRYPTO: Fix checkpatch errors & warnings in cipher.c

2010-02-09 Thread Richard Hartmann
Signed-off-by: Richard Hartmann --- crypto/compress.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/crypto/compress.c b/crypto/compress.c index 1ee3570..c33f076 100644 --- a/crypto/compress.c +++ b/crypto/compress.c @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ * * This program is free softw