Re: [PATCH 00/14] cpumask: cleanup cpumask_next_wrap() implementation and usage

2025-01-03 Thread Yury Norov
On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 08:02:29AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > You've sent me less than a handfull of 14 patches, there's no way > to properly review this. Hi Christoph, You can find the whole series here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/cabprks-uqfjmdp5ps+hsnvzggdmv0bnawpsvnpy4au4v+ud.

Re: [PATCH 00/14] cpumask: cleanup cpumask_next_wrap() implementation and usage

2025-01-02 Thread Christoph Hellwig
You've sent me less than a handfull of 14 patches, there's no way to properly review this.

[PATCH 00/14] cpumask: cleanup cpumask_next_wrap() implementation and usage

2024-12-28 Thread Yury Norov
cpumask_next_wrap() is overly complicated, comparing to it's generic version find_next_bit_wrap(), not mentioning it duplicates the above. It roots to the times when the function was used in the implementation of for_each_cpu_wrap() iterator. The function has 2 additional parameters that were used