On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 08:55:57AM +0100, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
>
> If I read the code correctly l and r are not read-only, e.g. in
> michael_update there are multiple assignments to mctx->l and mctx->r.
> That's the reason why I left them in the desc context.
I see. In that case your pat
Hello Herbert,
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 01:18:08AM +0100, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
>> The first patch removes the message schedule W from struct sha512_ctx
>> since it gets calculated anew on each execution of sha512_transform. This
>> reduces the size of sha512_ctx conside
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 01:18:08AM +0100, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
>
> The first patch removes the message schedule W from struct sha512_ctx
> since it gets calculated anew on each execution of sha512_transform. This
> reduces the size of sha512_ctx considerably and will allow it to be
> regi
This series converts the remaining hash algorithms to use the new shash
interface.
The first patch removes the message schedule W from struct sha512_ctx
since it gets calculated anew on each execution of sha512_transform. This
reduces the size of sha512_ctx considerably and will allow it to be
reg
