On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:17:30PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied to cryptodev-2.6. Thanks again!
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> Neil Horman wrote:
>> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:46:22AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 07:26:38PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rüegsegger wrote:
I was wondering why you created your own test vectors. Wouldn't
standardized test vectors by NIST o
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:19:50PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:48:48PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 08:45:42AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> >>> Copy that. I think I found the problem, anyway. The verdict is that
Neil Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:48:48PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 08:45:42AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>>> Copy that. I think I found the problem, anyway. The verdict is that
>>> Adrian was
>>> right, and I'm klutz. I mixed up the output vector from a s
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:48:48PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 08:45:42AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> > Copy that. I think I found the problem, anyway. The verdict is that
> > Adrian was
> > right, and I'm klutz. I mixed up the output vector from a successful and a
>
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 06:32:10PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:43:46AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> >
> > I just did a clean build on a different machine with the current HEAD
> > (ac3f925c2bb1b08a41713394d78098857d3f40a7)
> > of the cryptodev-2.6-tree. The two
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 08:45:42AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>
> Copy that. I think I found the problem, anyway. The verdict is that Adrian
> was
> right, and I'm klutz. I mixed up the output vector from a successful and a
> failed test during development. I'll repost shortly. Sorry for the t
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:43:46AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
>
> I just did a clean build on a different machine with the current HEAD
> (ac3f925c2bb1b08a41713394d78098857d3f40a7)
> of the cryptodev-2.6-tree. The two tests fail on that box too. :( I will see
> if I can spot something s
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:43:46AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 06:09:46PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> >> Neil Horman wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 03:10:14AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> Neil Horman wrote:
>
Neil Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 06:09:46PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
>> Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 03:10:14AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
Neil Horman wrote:
[snip]
These tests both seem to fail on my machine. Did you verify that the tes
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 06:09:46PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 03:10:14AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> >> Neil Horman wrote:
> >>> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:06:25AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Could you document the source of
Neil Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 03:44:23AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
>> Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:46:22AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 07:26:38PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rüegsegger wrote:
> I was wondering why you created your o
Neil Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 03:10:14AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
>> Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:06:25AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Could you document the source of these vectors in the patch
description please?
>>> Sure, reposting
>>>
>>> Pa
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 03:10:14AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:06:25AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >> Could you document the source of these vectors in the patch
> >> description please?
> >
> > Sure, reposting
> >
> > Patch to add check
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 03:44:23AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:46:22AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 07:26:38PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rüegsegger wrote:
> >>> I was wondering why you created your own test vectors. Would
Neil Horman wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:46:22AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 07:26:38PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rüegsegger wrote:
>>> I was wondering why you created your own test vectors. Wouldn't
>>> standardized test vectors by NIST or ANSI be preferable?
>> If you coul
Neil Horman wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:06:25AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> Could you document the source of these vectors in the patch
>> description please?
>
> Sure, reposting
>
> Patch to add checking of DES3 test vectors using CBC mode. FIPS-140-2
> compliance mandates that any sup
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:46:22AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 07:26:38PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rüegsegger wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering why you created your own test vectors. Wouldn't
> > standardized test vectors by NIST or ANSI be preferable?
>
> If you could post a patch
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 07:26:38PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rüegsegger wrote:
>
> I was wondering why you created your own test vectors. Wouldn't standardized
> test vectors by NIST or ANSI be preferable?
If you could post a patch with those that would be very much
appreciated. Thanks!
--
Visit Opens
Neil Horman wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:06:25AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> Could you document the source of these vectors in the patch
>> description please?
>
> Sure, reposting
>
> Patch to add checking of DES3 test vectors using CBC mode. FIPS-140-2
> compliance mandates that any sup
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:34:58PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Patch applied. Thanks a lot Neil!
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Ke
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:06:25AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Could you document the source of these vectors in the patch
> description please?
Sure, reposting
Patch to add checking of DES3 test vectors using CBC mode. FIPS-140-2
compliance mandates that any supported mode of operation must inc
Hi Neil:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 04:18:55PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> Patch to add checking of DES3 test vectors using CBC mode. FIPS-1402-2
> compliance mandates that any supported mode of oepration must include a self
> test. This satisfies that requirement for cbc(des_ebe). Tested successf
Patch to add checking of DES3 test vectors using CBC mode. FIPS-1402-2
compliance mandates that any supported mode of oepration must include a self
test. This satisfies that requirement for cbc(des_ebe). Tested successfully by
me
Regards
Neil
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tc
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 08:03:00AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 04:09:38PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > Patch to add checking of DES3 test vectors using CBC mode. FIPS-1402-2
> > compliance mandates that any supported mode of oepration must include a self
> > test. This sat
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 04:09:38PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> Patch to add checking of DES3 test vectors using CBC mode. FIPS-1402-2
> compliance mandates that any supported mode of oepration must include a self
> test. This satisfies that requirement for cbc(des_ebe). Tested successfully
> by
Patch to add checking of DES3 test vectors using CBC mode. FIPS-1402-2
compliance mandates that any supported mode of oepration must include a self
test. This satisfies that requirement for cbc(des_ebe). Tested successfully by
me
Regards
Neil
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tc
27 matches
Mail list logo
