On Sat 03 Sep 09:45 PDT 2016, Iaroslav Gridin wrote:
> Without that, QCE performance is about 2x less.
>
> Signed-off-by: Iaroslav Gridin
> ---
> drivers/crypto/qce/core.c | 18 +-
> drivers/crypto/qce/core.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff
> > + ret = clk_set_rate(qce->core_src, 1);
>
> Could you point me from where you got this number?
I got it from codeaurora qce driver:
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-msm-hammerhead-3.4-kk-r1/drivers/crypto/msm/qce50.c#3386
--
To unsubscribe from this list: se
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 04:04:01PM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> Hi Iaroslav,
>
> On 09/03/2016 07:45 PM, Iaroslav Gridin wrote:
> > Without that, QCE performance is about 2x less.
>
> On which platform? The clock rates are per SoC.
Dragonboard 8074. Should clock rate be moved to its DT?
>
Hi Iaroslav,
On 09/03/2016 07:45 PM, Iaroslav Gridin wrote:
> Without that, QCE performance is about 2x less.
On which platform? The clock rates are per SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Iaroslav Gridin
> ---
> drivers/crypto/qce/core.c | 18 +-
> drivers/crypto/qce/core.h | 2 +-
> 2
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 07:45:35PM +0300, Iaroslav Gridin wrote:
>
> @@ -247,6 +261,8 @@ err_clks_iface:
> clk_disable_unprepare(qce->iface);
> err_clks_core:
> clk_disable_unprepare(qce->core);
> +err_clks_core_src:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(qce->core_src);
What about qce_crypto_
Without that, QCE performance is about 2x less.
Signed-off-by: Iaroslav Gridin
---
drivers/crypto/qce/core.c | 18 +-
drivers/crypto/qce/core.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c b/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c
index 0cd
