On 27/06/2019 09:42, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 23:11, Samuel Neves wrote:
>>
>> , On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 8:40 AM Milan Broz wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26/06/2019 09:15, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>
Thanks for the insight. So I guess we have consensus that MORUS should
be remov
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 23:11, Samuel Neves wrote:
>
> , On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 8:40 AM Milan Broz wrote:
> >
> > On 26/06/2019 09:15, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the insight. So I guess we have consensus that MORUS should
> > > be removed. How about aegis128l and aegis256, which h
, On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 8:40 AM Milan Broz wrote:
>
> On 26/06/2019 09:15, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the insight. So I guess we have consensus that MORUS should
> > be removed. How about aegis128l and aegis256, which have been
> > disregarded in favor of aegis128 by CAESAR (note tha
On 26/06/2019 09:15, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Thanks for the insight. So I guess we have consensus that MORUS should
> be removed. How about aegis128l and aegis256, which have been
> disregarded in favor of aegis128 by CAESAR (note that I sent an
> accelerated ARM/arm64 version of aegis128 based on
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 09:00, Milan Broz wrote:
>
> On 25/06/2019 20:37, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 19:12, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >>
> >> [+Cc Milan]
>
> I was discussing this with Ondra before he sent the reply, anyway comments
> below:
>
> >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:52:
On 25/06/2019 20:37, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 19:12, Eric Biggers wrote:
>>
>> [+Cc Milan]
I was discussing this with Ondra before he sent the reply, anyway comments
below:
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:52:54PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> MORUS was not selected as a w
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 19:12, Eric Biggers wrote:
>
> [+Cc Milan]
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:52:54PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > MORUS was not selected as a winner in the CAESAR competition, which
> > is not surprising since it is considered to be cryptographically
> > broken. (Note that
Hi Ard,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 5:58 PM Ard Biesheuvel
wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 17:27, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 4:53 PM Ard Biesheuvel
> > wrote:
> > > MORUS was not selected as a winner in the CAESAR competition, which
> > > is not surprising since it is con
[+Cc Milan]
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:52:54PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> MORUS was not selected as a winner in the CAESAR competition, which
> is not surprising since it is considered to be cryptographically
> broken. (Note that this is not an implementation defect, but a flaw
> in the underl
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 17:27, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Hi Ard,
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 4:53 PM Ard Biesheuvel
> wrote:
> > MORUS was not selected as a winner in the CAESAR competition, which
> > is not surprising since it is considered to be cryptographically
> > broken. (Note that this
Hi Ard,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 4:53 PM Ard Biesheuvel
wrote:
> MORUS was not selected as a winner in the CAESAR competition, which
> is not surprising since it is considered to be cryptographically
> broken. (Note that this is not an implementation defect, but a flaw
> in the underlying algorith
11 matches
Mail list logo
