On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 06:27:36AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
> There are many divide by 0 reports. This one got attention because it is in
> crypto, where i believe problems, even false positives, should be fixed.
Please don't top post.
AS your bug report is a false positive I'm rejecting your patc
There are many divide by 0 reports. This one got attention because it is in
crypto, where i believe problems, even false positives, should be fixed.
Tom
On 8/20/20 12:15 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 10:12:47AM -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote:
>> From: Tom Rix
>>
>> Clang static
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 10:12:47AM -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix
>
> Clang static analysis reports this error
>
> crypto/drbg.c:441:40: warning: Division by zero
> padlen = (inputlen + sizeof(L_N) + 1) % (drbg_blocklen(drbg));
> ~~
Am Sonntag, 2. August 2020, 19:12:47 CEST schrieb t...@redhat.com:
Hi Tom,
> From: Tom Rix
>
> Clang static analysis reports this error
>
> crypto/drbg.c:441:40: warning: Division by zero
> padlen = (inputlen + sizeof(L_N) + 1) % (drbg_blocklen(drbg));
> ~~
From: Tom Rix
Clang static analysis reports this error
crypto/drbg.c:441:40: warning: Division by zero
padlen = (inputlen + sizeof(L_N) + 1) % (drbg_blocklen(drbg));
~^~~
When drbg_bocklen fails it returns 0.
if (
