Am Mittwoch, 27. Juli 2016, 08:55:31 CEST schrieb David Howells:
Hi David,
> Mat Martineau wrote:
> > > Though, shall I stuff the wrapper code back into the existing dh_compute
> > > functions or can I leave them as separate functions?
> >
> > I'm not sure. In the existing code there's one keyc
Mat Martineau wrote:
> > Though, shall I stuff the wrapper code back into the existing dh_compute
> > functions or can I leave them as separate functions?
>
> I'm not sure. In the existing code there's one keyctl wrapper per keyctl
> command. A combined wrapper would need some extra logic to dec
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Stephan Mueller wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 13. Juli 2016, 16:17:12 schrieb Mat Martineau:
Hi Mat,
---8<
Add the interface logic to support DH with KDF handling support.
The dh_compute code now allows the following options:
- no KDF support / output of raw DH shared secr
Am Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2016, 04:00:57 schrieb Jeffrey Walton:
Hi Jeffrey,
> > Note, as shared secrets potentially post-processed by a KDF usually are
> > again used as key or data encryption keys, they need to be
> > truncated/expanded to a specific length anyway. A KDF inherently provides
> > t
> Note, as shared secrets potentially post-processed by a KDF usually are again
> used as key or data encryption keys, they need to be truncated/expanded to a
> specific length anyway. A KDF inherently provides the truncation support to
> any arbitrary length. Thus, I would think that the caller ne
Am Mittwoch, 13. Juli 2016, 16:17:12 schrieb Mat Martineau:
Hi Mat,
>
> > ---8<
> >
> > Add the interface logic to support DH with KDF handling support.
> >
> > The dh_compute code now allows the following options:
> >
> > - no KDF support / output of raw DH shared secret:
> > dh_compute
Stephan,
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Stephan Mueller wrote:
Hi Mat, David,
During the development of this patch, I saw that the test
framework seems to be broken: when I change the expected
values by one bit, the test framework will still mark the
received result as PASS even though the returned dat
Hi Mat, David,
During the development of this patch, I saw that the test
framework seems to be broken: when I change the expected
values by one bit, the test framework will still mark the
received result as PASS even though the returned data does
not match the expected data.
---8<
Add the in
