On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:23:06PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > If af_alg_make_sg() returns <0 in hash_sendmsg() we'll jump to the
> > 'unlock' label without having set 'err' to anything. At the 'unlock'
> > label the value of 'err' is tested to determine
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:23:06PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> If af_alg_make_sg() returns <0 in hash_sendmsg() we'll jump to the
> 'unlock' label without having set 'err' to anything. At the 'unlock'
> label the value of 'err' is tested to determine return value of the
> function - not good to bas
From: Jesper Juhl
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:23:06 +0200 (CEST)
> If af_alg_make_sg() returns <0 in hash_sendmsg() we'll jump to the
> 'unlock' label without having set 'err' to anything. At the 'unlock'
> label the value of 'err' is tested to determine return value of the
> function - not good to
If af_alg_make_sg() returns <0 in hash_sendmsg() we'll jump to the
'unlock' label without having set 'err' to anything. At the 'unlock'
label the value of 'err' is tested to determine return value of the
function - not good to base that on a uninitialized variable.
This patch sets 'err' to the ret
