On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:23:45AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> Okay, Herbert it is working. I've setup a tunnel between two boxes and
> was able to ping and copy stuff from /dev/zero on one box to /dev/null
> on the other.
Awesome, thanks a lot for verifying this Sebastian!
--
Vi
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2009-07-16 09:36:30 [+0200]:
>* Herbert Xu | 2009-07-16 10:34:13 [+0800]:
>
>>On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:16:01AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>>>
>>> Can you please pull my tree again? There were quite a few bugs
>>> that I fixed last night.
>>
>>Oh and please make sure y
* Herbert Xu | 2009-07-16 10:34:13 [+0800]:
>On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:16:01AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>>
>> Can you please pull my tree again? There were quite a few bugs
>> that I fixed last night.
>
>Oh and please make sure you have this patch applied too:
It passes the testmgr with that pat
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:16:01AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> Can you please pull my tree again? There were quite a few bugs
> that I fixed last night.
Oh and please make sure you have this patch applied too:
commit e9b25f16cda88b33fe15b30c009912e6c471edda
Author: Herbert Xu
Date: Thu Jul 16
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:06:06AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Herbert Xu | 2009-07-15 08:48:47 [+0800]:
>
> >Yes, that should be enough. You don't even ipsec-tools, just
> >a manual SA setup with ip xfrm should be good enough.
>
> I did not get that far:
>
> |alg: hash: Chunkin
* Herbert Xu | 2009-07-15 08:48:47 [+0800]:
>Yes, that should be enough. You don't even ipsec-tools, just
>a manual SA setup with ip xfrm should be good enough.
I did not get that far:
|alg: hash: Chunking test 1 failed for sha1-padlock
|: e9 95 22 0c 1b d1 0f 5f f1 fa ee 74 7d 27 cd b2
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:26:15PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> I have here a via nano so I should be able to test it.
> Do you have a particular test case in mind or should I just grab
> ipsec-tools, setup a tunnel and send a few packets?
Yes, that should be enough. You don't eve
* Herbert Xu | 2009-07-11 18:19:58 [+0800]:
>As I don't have the hardware supporting padlock-sha, could someone
>with access to it please test this for me? In particular, I'd like
>to see this tested with an actual IPsec connection.
I have here a via nano so I should be able to test it.
Do you ha
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 06:19:58PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Hi:
>
> This series of patches converts the padlock-sha implementation to
> shash. This is also the last legacy hash algorithm to be converted,
> apart from hmac which I had to revert as it would break padlock-sha
> unless the latter i
Hi:
This series of patches converts the padlock-sha implementation to
shash. This is also the last legacy hash algorithm to be converted,
apart from hmac which I had to revert as it would break padlock-sha
unless the latter is converted.
As I don't have the hardware supporting padlock-sha, could
10 matches
Mail list logo
