[PATCH v2] vio: make remove callback return void

ed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König --- Hello, I dropped the sparc specific files (i.e. all that Michael Ellerman didn't characterize as powerpc specific and verified that they are indeed sparc-only). The commit log is adapted accordingly. Best regards Uwe arch/powerpc/i

[PATCH v2] vio: make remove callback return void

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König --- Hello, v1 (sent with Message-Id: 20210127215010.99954-1-...@kleine-koenig.org> had an back then unfulfilled precondition for a patch to drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c. That patch already got into v5.11 as 5e9eff5dfa46 "

[PATCH] coresight: etm4x: Fix merge resolution for amba rework

0573d3fa4864 ("Merge branch 'devel-stable' of git://git.armlinux.org.uk/~rmk/linux-arm into char-misc-next") Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König --- On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:07:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:56:15AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-Köni

Re: [GIT PULL] immutable branch for amba changes targeting v5.12-rc1

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:18:17AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 10:37:44AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello Russell, hello Greg, > > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 07:15:51PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 202

Re: [GIT PULL] immutable branch for amba changes targeting v5.12-rc1

Hello Russell, hello Greg, On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 07:15:51PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 04:59:51PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux admin > wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 05:56:50PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 202

Re: [GIT PULL] immutable branch for amba changes targeting v5.12-rc1

that is bisectable without build problems, but if Russell (who already picked up the broken tag) considers his tree immutable and so isn't willing to rebase, then picking up the patch is the way to go. I suggest that Russell descides which option he wants to pick and tells Greg to do the sa

Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] amba: minor fix and various cleanups

;re setting > them for every struct device_driver, then there's no point doing that > and they may as well be in the bus_type. This is implemented in patch 5 already. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König| Indu

Re: [GIT PULL] immutable branch for amba changes targeting v5.12-rc1

Hello, On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 02:53:50PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > the following changes since commit 5c8fe583cce542aa0b84adc939ce85293de36e5e: > > Linux 5.11-rc1 (2020-12-27 15:30:22 -0800) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://git.pengutr

[PATCH] mailbox: arm_mhuv2: make remove callback return void

remove callback return void") Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König --- Hello, I guess I missed that driver during rebase as it was only introduced in the last merge window. Sorry for that. I'm unsure what is the right thing to do now. Should I redo the pull request (with this patch squashed int

[GIT PULL] immutable branch for amba changes targeting v5.12-rc1

otype ---- Uwe Kleine-König (5): amba: Fix resource leak for drivers without .remove amba: reorder functions vfio: platform: simplify device removal amba: Make the remove callback return void amba: Make use of bus_type func

Re: [PATCH] vio: make remove callback return void

Hello Sukadev, On 1/28/21 8:07 PM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: Slightly off-topic, should ndo_stop() also return a void? Its return value seems to be mostly ignored and [...] I don't know enough about the network stack to tell. Probably it's a good idea to start a separate thread for this and

[PATCH] vio: make remove callback return void

o a driver without a remove callback vio_cmo_bus_remove(viodev) wasn't called. As the device core still considers the device unbound after vio_bus_remove() returns calling this unconditionally is the consistent behaviour which is implemented here. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König --- Hello,

Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] amba: Make the remove callback return void

Hello, On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 05:08:40PM +, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > On 1/26/21 4:58 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > All amba drivers return 0 in their remove callback. Together with the > > driver core ignoring the return value anyhow, it doesn't make sense to >

[PATCH v3 4/5] amba: Make the remove callback return void

us Walleij Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König --- drivers/amba/bus.c | 5 ++--- drivers/char/hw_random/nomadik-rng.c | 3 +-- drivers/dma/pl330.c| 3 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drv.c | 4 +--- drivers

[PATCH v3 0/5] amba: minor fix and various cleanups

From: Uwe Kleine-König

Re: [PATCH 3/3] hwrng: mxc-fsl - add support for Freescale RNGC

Hello Fabio, On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 08:54:19PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Uwe Kleine-König > wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 06:16:50PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Steffen Trumtrar > >>

Re: [PATCH 3/3] hwrng: mxc-fsl - add support for Freescale RNGC

AL; dev_err(&pdev->dev, "FSL RNGC couldn't get irq\n"); clk_disable_unprepare(rngc->clk); return ret; } rngc->irq = ret; Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kle

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] crypto: sunxi-ss: fix min3() call to match types

t min(x, y) has the same type as x anyhow? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König| Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the b