Re: [PATCH] vti6: Add pmtu handling to vti6_xmit.

2016-03-30 Thread Mark McKinstry
I've tested this patch in our scenario and I can confirm that it still fixes all of our issues. On 22/03/16 23:53, Steffen Klassert wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 01:28:01PM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 09:52:05PM +, Mark McKinstry wrote: >>

Re: [PATCH] vti6: Add pmtu handling to vti6_xmit.

2016-03-14 Thread Mark McKinstry
On 04/03/16 20:05, Steffen Klassert wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:37:39PM +0000, Mark McKinstry wrote: >> On 19/02/16 01:19, Steffen Klassert wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 01:40:00AM +0000, Mark McKinstry wrote: >>>> This patch fixes our issue, thanks. I

Re: [PATCH] vti6: Add pmtu handling to vti6_xmit.

2016-02-24 Thread Mark McKinstry
On 19/02/16 01:19, Steffen Klassert wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 01:40:00AM +0000, Mark McKinstry wrote: >> This patch fixes our issue, thanks. In our scenario the tunnel path MTU >> now gets updated so that subsequent large packets sent over the tunnel >> get fragmen

Re: [PATCH] vti6: Add pmtu handling to vti6_xmit.

2016-02-17 Thread Mark McKinstry
On 17/02/16 20:08, Steffen Klassert wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 01:50:20AM +0000, Mark McKinstry wrote: >>> So this version is slightly modified to cover the IPv4 case in addition to >>> the IPv6 case. With this patch I was able to run netperf over either an >>&g

[PATCH] vti6: Add pmtu handling to vti6_xmit.

2016-02-09 Thread Mark McKinstry
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-crypto/msg15101.html > From: Steffen Klassert > > We currently rely on the PMTU discovery of xfrm. > However if a packet is localy sent, the PMTU mechanism > of xfrm tries to to local socket notification what > might not work for applications like ping that don't