first read.
Worth noticing that since msleep(0) schedules a one jiffy timeout is
better to skip such a call.
Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg
---
drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char
Data rates of MAX_UINT32 will schedule an unnecessary one jiffy
timeout on the call to msleep. Avoid this scenario by using 0 as the
unlimited data rate.
Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg
---
drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
first read.
Worth noticing that since msleep(0) schedules a one jiffy timeout is
better to skip such a call.
Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg
---
drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char
On 06/08/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 12:00, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
> wrote:
> >
> > On 06/08/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 02:08, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > &g
On 06/08/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 02:08, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
> wrote:
> >
> > On 05/08/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > Apologies for my delayed response as I was busy with some other tasks
> > > along with holidays.
> >
On 05/08/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> Apologies for my delayed response as I was busy with some other tasks
> along with holidays.
no pb! was just making sure this wasnt falling through some cracks.
>
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 19:53, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
> wrote:
> >
&
On 23/07/20, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> The current code waits for data to be available before attempting a
> second read. However the second read would not be executed as the
> while loop exits.
>
> This fix does not wait if all data has been read and reads a second
> time if
On 24/07/20, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries wrote:
> On 24/07/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 14:16, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The current code waits for data to be available before attempting a
> > > second read. Howeve
On 24/07/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 14:16, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> >
> > The current code waits for data to be available before attempting a
> > second read. However the second read would not be executed as the
> > while loop exits.
> >
does not attempt to read if not data is requested.
Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
---
v2: tidy up the while loop to avoid reading when no data is requested
drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/optee
Data rates of MAX_UINT32 will schedule an unnecessary one jiffy
timeout on the call to msleep. Avoid this scenario by using 0 as the
unlimited data rate.
Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
---
drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a
Data rates of MAX_UINT32 will schedule an unnecessary one jiffy
timeout on the call to msleep. Avoid this scenario by using 0 as the
unlimited data rate.
Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
---
drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a
: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
---
drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c
b/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c
index 5bc4700c4dae..967d58bb9fda 100644
--- a/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c
+++ b/drivers
13 matches
Mail list logo
