ed as well,
> required by __do_fault.
>
> Reported-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker
> Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao
Reviewed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker
> ---
> drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c | 9 -
> 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/uacce/uac
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 08:01:44PM +0800, zhangfei@foxmail.com wrote:
> > More generally, it would be nice to use the DMA API when SVA isn't
> > supported, instead of manually allocating and mapping memory with
> > iommu_map(). Do we only handcraft these functions in order to have VA ==
> > IOV
Hi Kenneth,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:49:07PM +0800, Kenneth Lee wrote:
> Dear Jean,
>
> Please let me answer your question about why we build another subsystem
> other than use vfio-mdev.
>
> I think you might remember that we did build WarpDrive on top of
> vfio-mdev from the very beginning.
Hi,
I already commented on the interface in patch 2/3, so I just have a few
additional comments on the documentation itself.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 04:34:31PM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> +The user API
> +
> +
> +We adopt a polling style interface in the user space: ::
> +
> + in
Hi,
I have a few comments on the overall design and some implementation
details below.
Could you also Cc io...@lists.linux-foundation.org on your next posting?
I'm sure some subscribers would be interested and I don't think many
people know about linux-accelerators yet.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 0
On 20/11/2018 09:16, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> +CC Jean-Phillipe and iommu list.
Thanks for the Cc, sorry I don't have enough bandwidth to follow this
thread at the moment.
> In WarpDrive/uacce, we make this simple. If you support IOMMU and it
> support
> SVM/SVA. Everything will be
On 07/09/2018 17:53, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> So there is no reasons to do that under VFIO. Especialy as in your example
> it is not a real user space device driver, the userspace portion only knows
> about writting command into command buffer AFAICT.
>
> VFIO is for real userspace driver where inte
Hi Kenneth,
On 10/08/18 04:39, Kenneth Lee wrote:
>> You can achieve everything you want to achieve with existing upstream
>> solution. Re-inventing a whole new driver infrastructure should really
>> be motivated with strong and obvious reasons.
>
> I want to understand better of your idea. If I