On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 09:39:33AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 03/11/2015 08:40 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:34:46 -0400
> > Sasha Levin wrote:
> >
> >> > Fair enough. We knew there are existing kmemcheck users, but KASan
> >> > should be
> >> > superior both in
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:30:48AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> There is recent interest in having a way to turn generally-available
> kernel features off. Maybe we should add a good one so we can stop
> bikeshedding and avoid proliferating dumb interfaces.
>
> Things that might want to
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:01:01PM +0300, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does attached patch help?
>
> crypto: aesni_intel - fix accessing of unaligned memory
It does, thanks for the quick turnaround!
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cr
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:13:04PM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Now, this is not a complete solution by any means: the core kernel is not
> > protected, and nor are /dev/mem or /dev/kmem, but it denies (or at least
> > controls) one relatively simple attack vector.
>
> Could we f
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:14:53PM -0800, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 21:45, Dave Jones wrote:
> > well, the situation for external modules is no worse than usual.
> > They still work, they just aren't signed. Which from a distributor po
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 09:35:40PM -0800, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 20:13, Dave Jones wrote:
> > I've not investigated it, but I hear rumours that suse has something
> > similar.
>
> Actually, no. We don't belive that module
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:41:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 77 files changed, 9681 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> just to be able to sign modules.
>
> Normally I'd collapse writhing in laughter, but..
>
> > These patches have been in use by RHEL and Fedora kernels for years, an
