QE tested this patch with virtio-net regression tests, everything works fine.
Tested-by: Lei Yang
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 3:08 AM Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
>
> virtcrypto_clear_request() does the same as the code here, but uses
> kfree_sensitive() for one of the free operation.
>
> So, better sa
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 12:52 PM Eric Snowberg wrote:
> > On Feb 28, 2025, at 9:14 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 9:09 AM Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2025-02-27 at 17:22 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'd still also like to see some discussion about moving towards the
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 12:19 PM Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-02-28 at 11:14 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 9:09 AM Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2025-02-27 at 17:22 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
...
> Ok, let's go through different scenarios to see if it would scale.
>
>
virtcrypto_clear_request() does the same as the code here, but uses
kfree_sensitive() for one of the free operation.
So, better safe than sorry, use virtcrypto_clear_request() directly to
save a few lines of code and cleanly free the memory.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET
---
I've no idea if