On 8/4/20 12:22, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 12:20:21PM +0800, Liwei Song wrote:
>>
>> Yes, the other process should do this zero work, but the case I met is
>> this address will appear in the slab_alloc_node() as freelist pointer of
>> slub,
>> and before slub do zero wrok, eve
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 12:20:21PM +0800, Liwei Song wrote:
>
> Yes, the other process should do this zero work, but the case I met is
> this address will appear in the slab_alloc_node() as freelist pointer of slub,
> and before slub do zero wrok, even kzalloc() doesn't work with this address.
Tha
On 8/4/20 12:04, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 11:51:47AM +0800, Liwei Song wrote:
>>
>> On 8/3/20 20:52, Herbert Xu wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 03:58:58PM +0800, Liwei Song wrote:
exist the following assignment in ccp(ignore the force
convert of the struct) by lis
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 11:51:47AM +0800, Liwei Song wrote:
>
> On 8/3/20 20:52, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 03:58:58PM +0800, Liwei Song wrote:
> >> exist the following assignment in ccp(ignore the force
> >> convert of the struct) by list_del in ccp_dequeue_cmd():
> >> req->__c
On 8/3/20 20:52, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 03:58:58PM +0800, Liwei Song wrote:
>> exist the following assignment in ccp(ignore the force
>> convert of the struct) by list_del in ccp_dequeue_cmd():
>> req->__ctx->cmd->entry->next = LIST_POISON1;
>>
>> after use the req, kzfree(r
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 03:48:02PM +0100, Elena Petrova wrote:
>
> sendmsg is used for "Additional Data" input, and unlike entropy, it
> could be useful outside of testing. But if you confirm it's not
> useful, then yes, I can decouple the testing parts.
Unless there is someone asking for it then
Hi all,
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:09:51 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the crypto tree got a conflict in:
>
> Documentation/crypto/api-intro.rst
>
> between commit:
>
> 5846551bb147 ("docs: crypto: convert api-intro.txt to ReST format")
>
> from the jc_docs tr
Hi all,
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:28:45 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/inst.h
>
> between commit:
>
> d7866e503bdc ("crypto: x86 - Remove include/asm/inst.h")
> (also "crypto: x86 - Put back integer parts
Hi all,
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 20:14:11 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/crypto/mediatek/mtk-aes.c
>
> between commit:
>
> f441ba2ad341 ("crypto: mediatek - use AES library for GCM key derivation")
>
> from th
Since crypto is a modern-only device,
tag config space fields as having little endian-ness.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
---
include/uapi/linux/virtio_crypto.h | 26 +-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_crypto.h
Hello,
This helps a bit...now download sw-crypt performance is about 150Mbps,
but still not as good as with my patch on 5.4 kernel, and fpu is still
high in perf top:
13.89% libc-2.29.so [.] __memset_sse2_unaligned_erms
6.62% [kernel] [k] kernel_fpu_begin
4.14% [kernel]
The pull request you sent on Mon, 3 Aug 2020 14:40:24 +1000:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/crypto-2.6.git linus
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/ab5c60b79ab6cc50b39bbb21b2f9fb55af900b84
Thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
Am Montag, 3. August 2020, 16:48:02 CEST schrieb Elena Petrova:
Hi Elena,
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 at 08:27, Herbert Xu
wrote:
> > Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > lock_sock() would solve the former. I'm not sure what should be done
> > > about
> > > rng_recvmsg(). It apparently relies on the crypto_r
2.6.git
master
head: 3cbfe80737c18ac6e635421ab676716a393d3074
commit: 190873a0ea4500433ae818521cad20d37f9ee059 [164/167] crypto: ingenic -
Add hardware RNG for Ingenic JZ4780 and X1000
:: branch date: 3 days ago
:: commit date: 3 days ago
config: mips-randconfig-c003-20200803 (atta
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 03:58:58PM +0800, Liwei Song wrote:
> exist the following assignment in ccp(ignore the force
> convert of the struct) by list_del in ccp_dequeue_cmd():
> req->__ctx->cmd->entry->next = LIST_POISON1;
>
> after use the req, kzfree(req) can not zero the entry
> entry->next = L
exist the following assignment in ccp(ignore the force
convert of the struct) by list_del in ccp_dequeue_cmd():
req->__ctx->cmd->entry->next = LIST_POISON1;
after use the req, kzfree(req) can not zero the entry
entry->next = LIST_POISON1 of the ccp_cmd(cmd) struct
when this address available as sl
16 matches
Mail list logo