Hi Herbert,
On 2 January 2017 at 12:23, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 12:16:45PM +0530, Binoy Jayan wrote:
>
> Right. The actual number of underlying tfms that do the work
> won't change compared to the status quo. We're just structuring
> it such that if the overall scheme is sup
Resurrecting an old thread, pulled out of
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-crypto/msg19192.html
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Anatoly Pugachev
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:33 AM, Sowmini Varadhan
wrote:
Hi Anatoly,
after commit c1e9b3b0eea1 ("hwrng: n2 - Attach on T5/M5, T7/M7 SP
On 2 January 2017 at 23:40, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 09:06:04PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 31 October 2016 at 16:13, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 11:08:36AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> >> On 18 October 2016 at 11:52,
This adds a scalar implementation of AES, based on the precomputed tables
that are exposed by the generic AES code. Since rotates are cheap on arm64,
this implementation only uses the 4 core tables (of 1 KB each), and avoids
the prerotated ones, reducing the D-cache footprint by 75%.
On Cortex-A57
Any update on this patch, should I base it on another tree, this was
based off of linus's tree right when he released 4.10-rc2
Should I send it close to the next merge window?
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 9:26 PM, wrote:
> From: Gideon Israel Dsouza
>
> Continuing from this commit: 52f5684c8e1e
> (
