On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 11/20/2015 02:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Friday 20 November 2015 12:25:06 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 11/19/2015 01:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>>> Another idea wou
On Friday 20 November 2015 14:52:03 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
> >> For legacy the filter function is pretty much needed to handle the
> >> differences
> >> between the platforms as not all of them does the filtering in a same way.
> >> So
> >> the first type of map would be feasible IMHO.
> >
> >
On 11/20/2015 12:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> That way the vast majority of drivers can use one of the two nice interfaces
>>> and the rest can be converted to use __dma_request_chan().
>>>
>>> On a related topic, we had in the past considered providing a way for
>>> platform code to register a
On 11/20/2015 02:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Friday 20 November 2015 12:25:06 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>> On 11/19/2015 01:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> Another idea would be to remove the filter function from struct dma_chan_map
>
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 20 November 2015 12:25:06 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> On 11/19/2015 01:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Another idea would be to remove the filter function from struct dma_chan_map
> and pass the map through platform data
Why not unifi
Hi Marcel, Mimi, Tadeus,
I want to consider adding or doing the following bits to the keyrings
facility, aiming for the next merge window:
(*) Bring in the patches that I posted to change how the trust model on a
keyring works.
The model will then be that keys aren't automatically mar
On Friday 20 November 2015 12:25:06 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 11/19/2015 01:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> dma_request_channel(mask); /* memcpy. etc, non slave mostly */
> >>
> >> Not sure how to name this as reusing existing (good, descriptive) function
> >> names would mean changes all over th
On 11/19/2015 01:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> If we have two main APIs, one to request slave channels and one to get any
>> channel with given capability
>> dma_request_slave_channel(NULL, NULL, &mask, fn, fn_param); /* Legacy slave
>> */
>> dma_request_slave_channel(dev, name, NULL, NULL, NULL)
